Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

What you touched on in your opening paragraph, Tulsi, is what Orwell describes as “reality control” in “1984.” CJ Hopkins and I discussed this at length here:

• “Dissident Dialogues: CJ Hopkins” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dissident-dialogues-cj-hopkins)

Totalitarian governments exercise control over our minds by demanding that we deny objective reality, as Orwell notes:

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

The supreme irony in regards to feminism, as you’ve noted, is that embracing the “tolerance” required by Wokeism reimposes the very oppression of women feminism was created to overcome.

P.S. The invitation is still open for you to participate in a future Dissident Dialogues exchange, Tulsi (we can do one question at a time via email, so the process is flexible and can take place over an indefinite time period based on what works best for you :-)

Expand full comment
Phil G's avatar

I have one daughter in telecommunications, a very male-dominated businss, and another in the entertainment world, also male-dominant. Both are treated as less-than serious people even though they both are major players in their fields. THAT'S what feminists should be focused on, not multiple genders, pronouns, and euphanisms for what a person is. I can hardly contain myself when I see and hear people wasting time over such nonsense. SMH

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts